AF: Hi Bradley:
I have a nagging subject that I found myself questioning a lot.
You wrote about it in this article:
https://www.ptm.org/qr-if-god-
But my background, like your own, is from the charismatic evangelical ditch and now when I see people close to me in pain and suffering from sickness etc, I have a hard time to cope with the fact that God actually performs miracles in the world.
AF: At the end of the article, you wrote:
If God answers such a prayer, it is only because (1) Love is the highest law and (2) God saw, in that prayer, a willing human partner. God may respond to our prayers through very normal means or through highly unusual ways. But here’s the thing: my prayers don’t control how God will answer. I read of Jesus’ invitation to come to his Father with a bold ask, but I cannot presume to make demands of God as if God were my personal genie. When we do, I suspect that it is WE who want control… we want a tiny god who submits to our control.
Rather, I offer up my requests, raw and uncensored (like the Psalmist), and I leave the outcome and the people involved in God’s care. God’s care is always wiser and more mysterious than my diagnosis or my desire for control. But just as I can’t presume what God must do, I have also stopped limiting what God can do. With God, all things are possible, so I take Paul’s exhortation seriously: “Pray about everything.”
What about all those verses?
BJ: First, I think it’s exactly right to return to the Gospels, to the very words of Jesus, where we see an invitation to prayers of persistent knocking, bold asking, and a reminder that God is a good Father. Believe me, I lean on these all the time. I pray with them in mind. That’s not the problem. The problem for me is what these prayers come to mean when, for example, a full third of my former congregation was comprised of people with disabilities in full-time care – rows of precious people in wheelchairs, others with Down Syndrome, many with severe autism, and beyond that, people with the full-range of addictions, and a general membership for whom the death-rate is eventually 100%.
Same as above. We offer up our requests and trust God to hear and to act. What else can you do? Demand? Tried that. Despair? Did that. But what’s clear to me is that faith is not about working up psychological adrenaline to believe the impossible. It is more like putting the person in God’s caring arms and staying there with them regardless of how God acts or doesn’t.
AF: And how can we actually balance the view of a God that loves people and is there in the midst of our pain and suffering with the view of a God that chooses some to be miraculously healed from cancer, whose legs grew out, blind that will see and so on… and still we know people that love God passionately, have people praying for them fervently and still… they wither away, and nothing changes for them. That really upsets me, actually, and I don’t really know what to make of it.
AF: I believe in miracles; I believe in a good and loving God. I believe he wills for everyone to live a good and healthy life. And I believe he doesn’t control us. But if some people get a miracle, and some simply don’t? Then, is the conclusion that God actually favors some people over others?
AF: Or can some prayers be worth more to him?
AF: Or can some prayers affect the miracle more?
AF: Is it actually a matter of “having enough faith” for a miracle to happen? (Like I’ve been taught throughout my youth in charismatic churches). Or is it just a gamble who gets the lucky shot?
AF: Sorry for my rambling, but these thoughts really get to me. And I can’t see anywhere that you have answered these questions straight up. And maybe you don’t have an answer either. That we should all just rely on the higher ways of God, and so on. And sure, I can buy that.